Simple and secure access to all your online accounts. At work, home, and everywhere in between.
celigo vs Dashlane
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Dashlane (Simple and secure access to all your online accounts. At work, home, and everywhere in between.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo and Dashlane sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Dashlane is ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Dashlane. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is slightly ahead of Dashlane. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Dashlane is clearly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Dashlane shows 1,223 stars across 46 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Dashlane's footprint is roughly 28.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Dashlane looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Dashlane |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 36 |
| Code | 39 | 48 |
| Education | 57 | 53 |
| Community | 29 | 29 |
| Reach | 52 | 47 |
| Momentum | 12 | 38 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 1,223 |
| Forks | 131 | 253 |
| Public repos | 26 | 46 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 5 |
| External contributors | 5 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 32 |