celigo vs Discourse

celigo and Discourse (The 100% open source discussion platform built for the next decade of the Internet.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Discourse (rank #189) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 36). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Discourse is clearly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Discourse. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Discourse is ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Discourse. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Discourse is clearly ahead of celigo.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Discourse shows 55,678 stars across 620 public repos, 90 active in the last 90 days and 44 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Discourse's footprint is roughly 1294.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Discourse looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.