Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

celigo vs Ecwid

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

celigo and Ecwid both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

celigo (rank #538) holds a narrow lead over Ecwid (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ecwid is slightly ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ecwid is slightly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Ecwid.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Ecwid shows 1,169 stars across 43 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ecwid's footprint is roughly 27.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Ecwid looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricceligoEcwid
Ranking
Overall rank#538#728
Pillars
Overall3630
Code3944
Education5757
Community2931
Reach520
Momentum1212
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars431,169
Forks131623
Public repos2643
Active repos (90d)66
External contributors510
Avg polish3448
Avg AI-readiness3022

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View celigo developer profileView Ecwid developer profile