celigo vs Fillout

celigo and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Fillout (rank #510) holds a narrow lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (37 vs 36). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), celigo is slightly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Fillout. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is slightly ahead of Fillout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Fillout is slightly ahead of celigo.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but celigo's footprint is roughly 21.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Fillout looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.