celigo vs Intuit
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Intuit (Powering prosperity around the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Intuit (rank #237) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 36). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Intuit is clearly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Intuit is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Intuit is ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Intuit. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Intuit is clearly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Intuit shows 18,182 stars across 150 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 40 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Intuit's footprint is roughly 422.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Intuit looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Intuit |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 48 |
| Code | 39 | 65 |
| Education | 57 | 76 |
| Community | 29 | 48 |
| Reach | 52 | 24 |
| Momentum | 12 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 18,182 |
| Forks | 131 | 4,233 |
| Public repos | 26 | 150 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 27 |
| External contributors | 5 | 40 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 70 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 40 |