celigo vs Linear

celigo and Linear (A purpose-built tool for planning and building products) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Linear (rank #103) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (55 vs 36). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Linear is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Linear. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Linear is slightly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Linear is clearly ahead of celigo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Linear is clearly ahead of celigo.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Linear shows 1,971 stars across 22 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Linear's footprint is roughly 45.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Linear looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.