celigo vs Loom
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Loom (Async Video Messaging for Work) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Loom (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), celigo is slightly ahead of Loom. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Loom. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of Loom. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Loom. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Loom is ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Loom shows 50 stars across 32 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Loom looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Loom |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 31 |
| Code | 39 | 37 |
| Education | 57 | 52 |
| Community | 29 | 11 |
| Reach | 52 | 3 |
| Momentum | 12 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 50 |
| Forks | 131 | 13 |
| Public repos | 26 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 5 |
| External contributors | 5 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 32 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 34 |