celigo vs Malwarebytes
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo and Malwarebytes sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Malwarebytes. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is ahead of Malwarebytes. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is clearly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Malwarebytes shows 38 stars across 20 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Malwarebytes looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Malwarebytes |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 36 |
| Code | 39 | 54 |
| Education | 57 | 73 |
| Community | 29 | 23 |
| Reach | 52 | 34 |
| Momentum | 12 | 66 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 38 |
| Forks | 131 | 6 |
| Public repos | 26 | 20 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 4 |
| External contributors | 5 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 28 |