Maxio - historically Chargify and SaaSOptics
celigo vs Maxio, LLC maxio-com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Maxio, LLC maxio-com (Maxio - historically Chargify and SaaSOptics) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Maxio, LLC maxio-com (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 36). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Maxio, LLC maxio-com is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Maxio, LLC maxio-com is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Maxio, LLC maxio-com is slightly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Maxio, LLC maxio-com. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Maxio, LLC maxio-com is ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Maxio, LLC maxio-com shows 61 stars across 37 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Maxio, LLC maxio-com looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Maxio, LLC maxio-com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 38 |
| Code | 39 | 47 |
| Education | 57 | 66 |
| Community | 29 | 33 |
| Reach | 52 | 17 |
| Momentum | 12 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 61 |
| Forks | 131 | 33 |
| Public repos | 26 | 37 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 14 |
| External contributors | 5 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 35 |