celigo vs Patreon

celigo and Patreon both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

celigo and Patreon sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (36), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Patreon is ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Patreon is slightly ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Patreon. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Patreon is ahead of celigo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), celigo is ahead of Patreon.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Patreon shows 846 stars across 62 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Patreon's footprint is roughly 19.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Patreon looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.