celigo vs pCloud Open Source
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and pCloud Open Source both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over pCloud Open Source (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 32). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), pCloud Open Source is slightly ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of pCloud Open Source. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), pCloud Open Source is slightly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. pCloud Open Source shows 867 stars across 16 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but pCloud Open Source's footprint is roughly 20.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. pCloud Open Source looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | pCloud Open Source |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 32 |
| Code | 39 | 39 |
| Education | 57 | 64 |
| Community | 29 | 27 |
| Reach | 52 | 55 |
| Momentum | 12 | 12 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 867 |
| Forks | 131 | 285 |
| Public repos | 26 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 4 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 37 |