celigo vs Pirsch Analytics

celigo and Pirsch Analytics (Pirsch is a simple, privacy-friendly, open-source alternative to Google Analytics - lightweight, cookie-free and easily integrated into any website. By @emvi.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Pirsch Analytics (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 33). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Pirsch Analytics is ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Pirsch Analytics is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pirsch Analytics is slightly ahead of celigo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Pirsch Analytics.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Pirsch Analytics shows 1,203 stars across 24 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Pirsch Analytics's footprint is roughly 28.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Pirsch Analytics looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.