celigo vs Qonto

celigo and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 36). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Qonto. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is clearly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is ahead of celigo.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 11.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.