celigo vs Sysdig
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Sysdig (Security for containers, Kubernetes, and cloud services) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
celigo (rank #536) holds a narrow lead over Sysdig (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), celigo is clearly ahead of Sysdig. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), celigo is slightly ahead of Sysdig. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of Sysdig. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is ahead of Sysdig. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Sysdig is clearly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Sysdig shows 284 stars across 6 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Sysdig's footprint is roughly 6.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Sysdig looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Sysdig |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 31 |
| Code | 39 | 18 |
| Education | 57 | 54 |
| Community | 29 | 18 |
| Reach | 52 | 34 |
| Momentum | 12 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 284 |
| Forks | 131 | 40 |
| Public repos | 26 | 6 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 1 |
| External contributors | 5 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 25 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 12 |