celigo vs UserTesting

celigo and UserTesting (Real. Human. Insight.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

celigo (rank #538) holds a narrow lead over UserTesting (rank #692) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 31). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), celigo is slightly ahead of UserTesting. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UserTesting is slightly ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is ahead of UserTesting. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is ahead of UserTesting. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), celigo is ahead of UserTesting.

celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. UserTesting shows 15 stars across 119 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. UserTesting looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.