celigo vs Wistia
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
celigo and Wistia (One place for all your team’s video-ing) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Wistia (rank #278) holds a modest lead over celigo (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 36). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wistia is slightly ahead of celigo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wistia is ahead of celigo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), celigo is slightly ahead of Wistia. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), celigo is ahead of Wistia. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Wistia is clearly ahead of celigo.
celigo carries 43 GitHub stars across 26 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Wistia shows 680 stars across 173 public repos, 23 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Wistia's footprint is roughly 15.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
celigo is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Wistia looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | celigo | Wistia |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #536 | #278 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 36 | 46 |
| Code | 39 | 45 |
| Education | 57 | 77 |
| Community | 29 | 21 |
| Reach | 52 | 40 |
| Momentum | 12 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 43 | 680 |
| Forks | 131 | 173 |
| Public repos | 26 | 173 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 23 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 34 | 43 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 30 | 29 |