Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.
Chargebee vs Culture Amp
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) and Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Chargebee (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chargebee is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Chargebee is slightly ahead of Culture Amp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Culture Amp.
Chargebee carries 651 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Culture Amp shows 1,202 stars across 179 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors.
Chargebee is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Culture Amp looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chargebee | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 31 |
| Code | 52 | 53 |
| Education | 52 | 49 |
| Community | 25 | 24 |
| Reach | 16 | 20 |
| Momentum | 61 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 651 | 1,202 |
| Forks | 582 | 123 |
| Public repos | 45 | 179 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 17 |
| External contributors | 1 | 18 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 51 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 38 |