Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.
Chargebee vs Duo Security
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) and Duo Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Duo Security (rank #278) holds a narrow lead over Chargebee (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (46 vs 41). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Duo Security is ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Duo Security is ahead of Chargebee. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Duo Security is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Duo Security is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is slightly ahead of Duo Security.
Chargebee carries 651 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Duo Security shows 1,477 stars across 52 public repos, 15 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.
Chargebee is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Duo Security looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chargebee | Duo Security |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #278 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 46 |
| Code | 52 | 63 |
| Education | 52 | 69 |
| Community | 25 | 30 |
| Reach | 16 | 24 |
| Momentum | 61 | 58 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 651 | 1,477 |
| Forks | 582 | 1,092 |
| Public repos | 45 | 52 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 15 |
| External contributors | 1 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 66 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 43 |