Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.
Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org
Chargebee vs edX
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) and edX (Online learning at https://edx.org, powered by the Open edX platform https://openedx.org) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
edX (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Chargebee (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 41). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), edX is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chargebee is ahead of edX. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Chargebee is slightly ahead of edX. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), edX is ahead of Chargebee. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is ahead of edX.
Chargebee carries 651 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. edX shows 392 stars across 250 public repos, 52 active in the last 90 days and 22 external contributors.
Chargebee is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. edX looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chargebee | edX |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 43 |
| Code | 52 | 58 |
| Education | 52 | 43 |
| Community | 25 | 22 |
| Reach | 16 | 33 |
| Momentum | 61 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 651 | 392 |
| Forks | 582 | 376 |
| Public repos | 45 | 250 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 52 |
| External contributors | 1 | 22 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 37 |