Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.
We are a small company with a big heart and all of our products are handcrafted with love.
Chargebee vs Nulab Inc
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) and Nulab Inc (We are a small company with a big heart and all of our products are handcrafted with love.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Chargebee (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Nulab Inc (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 34). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Nulab Inc is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Nulab Inc is ahead of Chargebee. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Nulab Inc is slightly ahead of Chargebee. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Chargebee is ahead of Nulab Inc. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Nulab Inc.
Chargebee carries 651 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Nulab Inc shows 1,860 stars across 87 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors.
Chargebee is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Nulab Inc looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chargebee | Nulab Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 34 |
| Code | 52 | 53 |
| Education | 52 | 70 |
| Community | 25 | 33 |
| Reach | 16 | 7 |
| Momentum | 61 | 24 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 651 | 1,860 |
| Forks | 582 | 483 |
| Public repos | 45 | 87 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 6 |
| External contributors | 1 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 33 |