Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.
Chargebee vs Zscaler, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chargebee (Billing Platform for Subscription Businesses.) and Zscaler, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Zscaler, Inc. (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Chargebee (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 41). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Chargebee. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Chargebee. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zscaler, Inc. is ahead of Chargebee. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zscaler, Inc. is clearly ahead of Chargebee. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Chargebee is clearly ahead of Zscaler, Inc..
Chargebee carries 651 GitHub stars across 45 public repos, with 20 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Zscaler, Inc. shows 337 stars across 58 public repos, 33 active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors.
Chargebee is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zscaler, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chargebee | Zscaler, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #298 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 45 |
| Code | 52 | 76 |
| Education | 52 | 65 |
| Community | 25 | 39 |
| Reach | 16 | 37 |
| Momentum | 61 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 651 | 337 |
| Forks | 582 | 199 |
| Public repos | 45 | 58 |
| Active repos (90d) | 20 | 33 |
| External contributors | 1 | 11 |
| Avg polish | 55 | 86 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 61 |