Subscription Analytics Platform
ChartMogul vs Cloudbeds
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ChartMogul (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ChartMogul is ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ChartMogul is ahead of Cloudbeds.
ChartMogul carries 112 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
ChartMogul is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ChartMogul | Cloudbeds |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #727 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 30 |
| Code | 47 | 43 |
| Education | 54 | 71 |
| Community | 53 | 29 |
| Reach | 14 | 0 |
| Momentum | 30 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 49 |
| Forks | 64 | 11 |
| Public repos | 21 | 29 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 9 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 39 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 30 |