Subscription Analytics Platform
The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.
ChartMogul vs Gravity Forms
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) and Gravity Forms (The most powerful form and workflow solution available for WordPress.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ChartMogul (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Gravity Forms (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Gravity Forms is clearly ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of Gravity Forms. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Gravity Forms is ahead of ChartMogul. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Gravity Forms is ahead of ChartMogul.
ChartMogul carries 112 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Gravity Forms shows 112 stars across 8 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
ChartMogul is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Gravity Forms looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ChartMogul | Gravity Forms |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 32 |
| Code | 47 | 21 |
| Education | 54 | 78 |
| Community | 53 | 12 |
| Reach | 14 | 29 |
| Momentum | 30 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 112 |
| Forks | 64 | 66 |
| Public repos | 21 | 8 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 2 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 24 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 8 |