Subscription Analytics Platform
ChartMogul vs Guesty
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) and Guesty both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ChartMogul (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Guesty (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is ahead of Guesty. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Guesty is ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of Guesty. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ChartMogul is ahead of Guesty. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ChartMogul is ahead of Guesty.
ChartMogul carries 112 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Guesty shows 1 stars across 21 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but ChartMogul's footprint is roughly 112.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
ChartMogul is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Guesty looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ChartMogul | Guesty |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 32 |
| Code | 47 | 36 |
| Education | 54 | 67 |
| Community | 53 | 28 |
| Reach | 14 | 0 |
| Momentum | 30 | 20 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 1 |
| Forks | 64 | 22 |
| Public repos | 21 | 21 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 1 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 27 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 36 |