Subscription Analytics Platform
ChartMogul vs Onfido
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) and Onfido both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ChartMogul and Onfido sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (41), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is slightly ahead of Onfido. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Onfido is ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of Onfido. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Onfido is clearly ahead of ChartMogul. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ChartMogul is slightly ahead of Onfido.
ChartMogul carries 112 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Onfido shows 1,268 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Onfido's footprint is roughly 11.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
ChartMogul is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Onfido looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ChartMogul | Onfido |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 41 |
| Code | 47 | 42 |
| Education | 54 | 71 |
| Community | 53 | 23 |
| Reach | 14 | 35 |
| Momentum | 30 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 1,268 |
| Forks | 64 | 777 |
| Public repos | 21 | 85 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 14 |
| External contributors | 3 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 31 |