Subscription Analytics Platform
ChartMogul vs tray.ai
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) and tray.ai both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
ChartMogul (rank #401) holds a modest lead over tray.ai (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is slightly ahead of tray.ai. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), tray.ai is slightly ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is clearly ahead of tray.ai. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ChartMogul is ahead of tray.ai. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ChartMogul is ahead of tray.ai.
ChartMogul carries 112 GitHub stars across 21 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. tray.ai shows 300 stars across 49 public repos, 2 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
ChartMogul is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. tray.ai looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ChartMogul | tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 31 |
| Code | 47 | 43 |
| Education | 54 | 61 |
| Community | 53 | 18 |
| Reach | 14 | 4 |
| Momentum | 30 | 17 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 112 | 300 |
| Forks | 64 | 109 |
| Public repos | 21 | 49 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 2 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 41 | 42 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 43 | 33 |