A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com
Checkout.com vs Clio
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Checkout.com (A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com) and Clio both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Checkout.com (rank #152) holds a modest lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 33). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Checkout.com is ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Checkout.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Checkout.com is ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Clio.
Checkout.com carries 542 GitHub stars across 55 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Clio shows 518 stars across 19 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Checkout.com is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Clio looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Checkout.com | Clio |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #152 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 52 | 33 |
| Code | 62 | 50 |
| Education | 54 | 84 |
| Community | 33 | 18 |
| Reach | 59 | 0 |
| Momentum | 64 | 42 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 542 | 518 |
| Forks | 505 | 163 |
| Public repos | 55 | 19 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 4 |
| External contributors | 11 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 60 | 38 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 39 |