A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com
Checkout.com vs Elastic Path Software
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Checkout.com (A collection of libraries and plugins for Checkout.com) and Elastic Path Software both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Checkout.com (rank #152) holds a meaningful lead over Elastic Path Software (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (52 vs 31). The gap of 21 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Checkout.com is slightly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Checkout.com is ahead of Elastic Path Software. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Checkout.com is clearly ahead of Elastic Path Software.
Checkout.com carries 542 GitHub stars across 55 public repos, with 26 repositories active in the last 90 days and 11 external contributors on record. Elastic Path Software shows 234 stars across 39 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Checkout.com is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Elastic Path Software makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Checkout.com | Elastic Path Software |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #152 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 52 | 31 |
| Code | 62 | 57 |
| Education | 54 | 54 |
| Community | 33 | 24 |
| Reach | 59 | 8 |
| Momentum | 64 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 542 | 234 |
| Forks | 505 | 80 |
| Public repos | 55 | 39 |
| Active repos (90d) | 26 | 8 |
| External contributors | 11 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 60 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 46 | 43 |