Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Chroma vs Cursor

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Chroma and Cursor both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Chroma (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Cursor (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 40). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Chroma is ahead of Cursor. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chroma is clearly ahead of Cursor. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cursor is ahead of Chroma. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cursor is slightly ahead of Chroma. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Cursor is clearly ahead of Chroma.

Chroma carries 30,602 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 94 external contributors on record. Cursor shows 44,397 stars across 8 public repos, 5 active in the last 90 days and 41 external contributors.

Chroma is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Cursor looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricChromaCursor
Ranking
Overall rank#209#430
Pillars
Overall4940
Code4126
Education8446
Community4254
Reach4043
Momentum1234
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars30,60244,397
Forks2,7703,777
Public repos298
Active repos (90d)65
External contributors9441
Avg polish4431
Avg AI-readiness3323

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Chroma developer profileView Cursor developer profile