Chroma vs GitHub Next
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chroma and GitHub Next (Exploring the future of software development) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Chroma (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over GitHub Next (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 41). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), GitHub Next is ahead of Chroma. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chroma is ahead of GitHub Next. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), GitHub Next is ahead of Chroma. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Chroma is clearly ahead of GitHub Next. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), GitHub Next is clearly ahead of Chroma.
Chroma carries 30,602 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 94 external contributors on record. GitHub Next shows 24,135 stars across 104 public repos, 21 active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors.
Chroma is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. GitHub Next looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chroma | GitHub Next |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #209 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 49 | 41 |
| Code | 41 | 53 |
| Education | 84 | 68 |
| Community | 42 | 57 |
| Reach | 40 | 17 |
| Momentum | 12 | 33 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 30,602 | 24,135 |
| Forks | 2,770 | 1,022 |
| Public repos | 29 | 104 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 21 |
| External contributors | 94 | 15 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 59 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 30 |