Chroma vs Marqo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Chroma and Marqo (Tensor search for humans.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Chroma (rank #209) holds a modest lead over Marqo (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 40). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Chroma is clearly ahead of Marqo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Chroma is slightly ahead of Marqo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Chroma is slightly ahead of Marqo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Marqo is clearly ahead of Chroma.
Chroma carries 30,602 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 6 repositories active in the last 90 days and 94 external contributors on record. Marqo shows 5,394 stars across 28 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 4 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Chroma's footprint is roughly 5.7x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Chroma is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Marqo looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Chroma | Marqo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #209 | #430 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 49 | 40 |
| Code | 41 | 41 |
| Education | 84 | 61 |
| Community | 42 | 39 |
| Reach | 40 | 36 |
| Momentum | 12 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 30,602 | 5,394 |
| Forks | 2,770 | 273 |
| Public repos | 29 | 28 |
| Active repos (90d) | 6 | 14 |
| External contributors | 94 | 4 |
| Avg polish | 44 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 33 | 35 |