ClickUp vs Pendo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
ClickUp and Pendo both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Pendo (rank #485) holds a narrow lead over ClickUp (rank #601) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (38 vs 34). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Pendo is slightly ahead of ClickUp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ClickUp is ahead of Pendo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Pendo is clearly ahead of ClickUp. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Pendo is ahead of ClickUp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Pendo is slightly ahead of ClickUp.
ClickUp carries 7 GitHub stars across 5 public repos, with 1 repositories active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors on record. Pendo shows 266 stars across 133 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Pendo's footprint is roughly 38.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
ClickUp is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Pendo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | ClickUp | Pendo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #601 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 38 |
| Code | 26 | 27 |
| Education | 76 | 61 |
| Community | 5 | 47 |
| Reach | 3 | 23 |
| Momentum | 28 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7 | 266 |
| Forks | 3 | 88 |
| Public repos | 5 | 133 |
| Active repos (90d) | 1 | 18 |
| External contributors | 0 | 6 |
| Avg polish | 23 | 34 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 24 | 18 |