Clio vs Culture Amp

Clio and Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Clio (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Culture Amp (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Culture Amp is ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Clio is ahead of Culture Amp.

Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Culture Amp shows 1,202 stars across 179 public repos, 15 active in the last 90 days and 16 external contributors.

Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Culture Amp looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.