Clio vs Doctolib

Clio and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Clio and Doctolib sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is ahead of Doctolib. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Doctolib is ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Clio is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Doctolib looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.