Clio vs Humaans
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Clio and Humaans (A better workplace starts here) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Clio (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over Humaans (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is ahead of Humaans. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Clio is slightly ahead of Humaans. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Clio is clearly ahead of Humaans.
Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Humaans shows 461 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Humaans makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Clio | Humaans |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #696 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 31 |
| Code | 50 | 50 |
| Education | 84 | 71 |
| Community | 18 | 15 |
| Reach | 0 | 0 |
| Momentum | 42 | 18 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 518 | 461 |
| Forks | 163 | 18 |
| Public repos | 19 | 9 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 43 |