Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Clio vs Orca Security

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Clio and Orca Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Orca Security (rank #568) holds a narrow lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Clio is ahead of Orca Security. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Orca Security. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Orca Security is ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is ahead of Clio.

Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Orca Security shows 230 stars across 35 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors.

Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Orca Security looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricClioOrca Security
Ranking
Overall rank#625#568
Pillars
Overall3335
Code5040
Education8457
Community1837
Reach021
Momentum4259
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars518230
Forks16373
Public repos1935
Active repos (90d)417
External contributors312
Avg polish3841
Avg AI-readiness3923

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Clio developer profileView Orca Security developer profile