Clio vs Orca Security
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Clio and Orca Security both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Orca Security (rank #568) holds a narrow lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Clio is ahead of Orca Security. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Orca Security. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Orca Security is ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Orca Security is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Orca Security is ahead of Clio.
Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Orca Security shows 230 stars across 35 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 12 external contributors.
Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Orca Security looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Clio | Orca Security |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #568 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 35 |
| Code | 50 | 40 |
| Education | 84 | 57 |
| Community | 18 | 37 |
| Reach | 0 | 21 |
| Momentum | 42 | 59 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 518 | 230 |
| Forks | 163 | 73 |
| Public repos | 19 | 35 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 17 |
| External contributors | 3 | 12 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 41 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 23 |