Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Clio vs Starling Bank

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Clio and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Clio and Starling Bank sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Clio is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Clio.

Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricClioStarling Bank
Ranking
Overall rank#625#625
Pillars
Overall3333
Code5050
Education8455
Community189
Reach063
Momentum4248
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars518195
Forks16329
Public repos193
Active repos (90d)43
External contributors30
Avg polish3858
Avg AI-readiness3914

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Clio developer profileView Starling Bank developer profile