Clio vs Starling Bank
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Clio and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Clio and Starling Bank sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (33), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Clio is ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Clio.
Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Clio | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 33 |
| Code | 50 | 50 |
| Education | 84 | 55 |
| Community | 18 | 9 |
| Reach | 0 | 63 |
| Momentum | 42 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 518 | 195 |
| Forks | 163 | 29 |
| Public repos | 19 | 3 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 3 |
| External contributors | 3 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 14 |