Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.
Clio vs TaxJar
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Clio and TaxJar (Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Clio (rank #625) holds a narrow lead over TaxJar (rank #696) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (33 vs 31). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), TaxJar is ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is ahead of TaxJar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), TaxJar is slightly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Clio is ahead of TaxJar.
Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. TaxJar shows 491 stars across 39 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. TaxJar looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Clio | TaxJar |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #625 | #696 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 33 | 31 |
| Code | 50 | 63 |
| Education | 84 | 71 |
| Community | 18 | 18 |
| Reach | 0 | 1 |
| Momentum | 42 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 518 | 491 |
| Forks | 163 | 279 |
| Public repos | 19 | 39 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 1 |
| External contributors | 3 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 38 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 41 |