Clio vs UXPin

Clio and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

UXPin (rank #569) holds a narrow lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (35 vs 33). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Clio is ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is ahead of UXPin. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Clio is slightly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Clio is slightly ahead of UXPin.

Clio carries 518 GitHub stars across 19 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Clio is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.