Close vs Doctolib

Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Close (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 33). The gap of 12 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Close. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is slightly ahead of Close. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Close is slightly ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Doctolib is ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Close is clearly ahead of Doctolib.

Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Close's footprint is roughly 5.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Doctolib looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.