The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs
Close vs Dropbox
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Dropbox both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Dropbox (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Close (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 45). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Close is ahead of Dropbox. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Dropbox is ahead of Close. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Dropbox is clearly ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Dropbox is slightly ahead of Close.
Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Dropbox shows 61,045 stars across 247 public repos, 29 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Dropbox's footprint is roughly 15.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Dropbox looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Close | Dropbox |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #298 | #257 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 45 | 47 |
| Code | 48 | 48 |
| Education | 64 | 51 |
| Community | 35 | 46 |
| Reach | 0 | 37 |
| Momentum | 56 | 58 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,871 | 61,045 |
| Forks | 639 | 8,223 |
| Public repos | 190 | 247 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 29 |
| External contributors | 10 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 52 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 33 |