Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Close vs Lansweeper NV

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Close (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 30). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Close is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Close is slightly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Close is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Close is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCloseLansweeper NV
Ranking
Overall rank#298#728
Pillars
Overall4530
Code480
Education6460
Community350
Reach050
Momentum5628
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars3,8710
Forks6390
Public repos1900
Active repos (90d)250
External contributors100
Avg polish490
Avg AI-readiness320

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Close developer profileView Lansweeper NV developer profile