The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs
Close vs Lodgify
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Lodgify both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Close (rank #298) holds a modest lead over Lodgify (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 30). The gap of 15 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Close is ahead of Lodgify. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Close. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Close is clearly ahead of Lodgify. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lodgify is slightly ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Close is ahead of Lodgify.
Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Lodgify shows 13 stars across 16 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Close's footprint is roughly 297.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Lodgify looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Close | Lodgify |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #298 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 45 | 30 |
| Code | 48 | 36 |
| Education | 64 | 65 |
| Community | 35 | 8 |
| Reach | 0 | 7 |
| Momentum | 56 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,871 | 13 |
| Forks | 639 | 76 |
| Public repos | 190 | 16 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 3 |
| External contributors | 10 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 35 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 24 |