Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Close vs Recurly

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Close (rank #298) holds a narrow lead over Recurly (rank #317) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (45 vs 44). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is ahead of Close. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Close is slightly ahead of Recurly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Close is slightly ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Recurly is slightly ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is slightly ahead of Close.

Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Recurly looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCloseRecurly
Ranking
Overall rank#298#317
Pillars
Overall4544
Code4868
Education6457
Community3534
Reach07
Momentum5664
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars3,8711,564
Forks639700
Public repos19053
Active repos (90d)2526
External contributors105
Avg polish4970
Avg AI-readiness3237

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Close developer profileView Recurly developer profile