The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Close vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Close (The inside sales CRM of choice for SMBs) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Close (rank #298) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 45). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of Close. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Close is slightly ahead of Teamwork.com. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Close. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Close. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Close is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Close carries 3,871 GitHub stars across 190 public repos, with 25 repositories active in the last 90 days and 10 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Close is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Close | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #298 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 45 | 48 |
| Code | 48 | 58 |
| Education | 64 | 59 |
| Community | 35 | 37 |
| Reach | 0 | 47 |
| Momentum | 56 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,871 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 639 | 384 |
| Public repos | 190 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 25 | 14 |
| External contributors | 10 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 49 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 38 |