Cloudbeds vs Formspark

Cloudbeds and Formspark both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Formspark (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Formspark shows 68 stars across 8 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Formspark looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.