Cloudbeds vs Hotjar

Cloudbeds and Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #318) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Cloudbeds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Hotjar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Hotjar shows 52 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Hotjar looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.