Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Cloudbeds vs Malwarebytes

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Cloudbeds and Malwarebytes (Cyberprotection for every one.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Malwarebytes (rank #537) holds a narrow lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (36 vs 30). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Malwarebytes is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Malwarebytes is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Malwarebytes. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Malwarebytes is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Malwarebytes is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Malwarebytes shows 38 stars across 20 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Malwarebytes looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricCloudbedsMalwarebytes
Ranking
Overall rank#727#537
Pillars
Overall3036
Code4354
Education7173
Community2923
Reach034
Momentum1866
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars4938
Forks116
Public repos2920
Active repos (90d)94
External contributors33
Avg polish3953
Avg AI-readiness3028

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Cloudbeds developer profileView Malwarebytes developer profile