Cloudbeds vs Matomo Analytics

Cloudbeds and Matomo Analytics (Matomo is hiring 🚀 Matomo.org/jobs MISSION: « To create, as a community, the leading open analytics platform that gives every user full control of their data ») both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Matomo Analytics (rank #339) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 30). The gap of 13 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Matomo Analytics. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Matomo Analytics is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Matomo Analytics is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Matomo Analytics shows 30,625 stars across 90 public repos, 43 active in the last 90 days and 36 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Matomo Analytics's footprint is roughly 625.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Matomo Analytics looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.