Cloudbeds vs Mattermost

Cloudbeds and Mattermost (Mattermost is a secure collaboration platform for connecting your teams, tools and processes to accelerate mission-critical work.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Mattermost (rank #39) holds a meaningful lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (62 vs 30). The gap of 32 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is slightly ahead of Mattermost. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Mattermost is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Mattermost is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Cloudbeds carries 49 GitHub stars across 29 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors on record. Mattermost shows 49,900 stars across 263 public repos, 59 active in the last 90 days and 103 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Mattermost's footprint is roughly 1018.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Cloudbeds is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Mattermost looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.